honda0105

Champion Author
Tallahassee
Posts:18,632 Points:1,610,495 Joined:Nov 2008
|
Message Posted: Sep 30, 2012 11:00:08 PM
hope it will not be taken by force.
|
teenitup

Champion Author
Houston
Posts:1,655 Points:250,910 Joined:Sep 2012
|
Message Posted: Sep 30, 2012 10:40:43 AM
It was posted that Holland of Texas Rice Land Partners was offered almost half a million dollars for the easement! He rejected it.
|
honda0105

Champion Author
Tallahassee
Posts:18,632 Points:1,610,495 Joined:Nov 2008
|
Message Posted: Sep 30, 2012 7:40:16 AM
agree w/ LEC and Mm.
|
LetemEatCake

Champion Author
Oklahoma City
Posts:5,596 Points:1,206,355 Joined:Mar 2008
|
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 10:24:28 PM
Agree with Martins's several comments! Unfortunately it is almost a done deal in TX because of there Railroad Commissions past actions.
I can only hope that in OK with the many sovereign Indian land, that this pipeline will become a non-issue! As in NO pipeline!
|
teenitup

Champion Author
Houston
Posts:1,655 Points:250,910 Joined:Sep 2012
|
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 2:23:22 PM
The Texas Property Code addresses Eminent Domain at great length as well, hardly a rubber stamp.
Texas Property Code
|
teenitup

Champion Author
Houston
Posts:1,655 Points:250,910 Joined:Sep 2012
|
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 2:19:59 PM
Lots of semantics being tossed around here.
The article is correct in reference to the Keystone XL reference.
From wiki " It consists of the operational "Keystone Pipeline" and "Keystone-Cushing Extension", and two proposed pipeline expansion segments, referred to as Keystone XL Pipeline and the Gulf Coast Project. After the Keystone XL pipeline segments are completed, American crude oil would enter the XL pipelines at Baker, Montana and Cushing, Oklahoma.[1]"
And according to the 1975 EPCA act since the XL segment from Hardisty to Baker Wyoming to Steele City Nebraska (separate drone the original Keystone from Hardisty to Steele City) will carry US Bakken crude, thus commingled with Canadian crude, the oil cannot be exported unless the President deems export is in the national interest (very rarely has this ever happened).
|
Martinman

Champion Author
Mississippi
Posts:14,739 Points:2,093,830 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 12:44:32 PM
Also realize that the above article, as written, is partially incorrect.
Those portions of the recently completed pipeline on the U.S. side of the border, *are* part of the Keystone XL pipeline project.
- Phase I involved the construction from the existing natural gas pipeline in Canada, to the Wood River refinery and Patoka storage facility extension - both in Illinois. (completed June 2010)
- Phase II involved construction of the Steele City Nebraska to Cushing Oklahoma section - both of which lay east of the Ogallala Aquifer. (completed February 2011)
- Phase III involves the current Cushing Oklahoma, to Nederland Texas, segment that is in dispute.
- Phase IV invovles the Canada to Steel City Nebraska routing that was stopped before any construction began.
|
sparky808

Champion Author
Honolulu
Posts:3,008 Points:599,685 Joined:Sep 2011
|
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 12:33:25 PM
Thank you for posting.
|
Martinman

Champion Author
Mississippi
Posts:14,739 Points:2,093,830 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 12:31:06 PM
That is how the Texas state Code is written.
It is little more than a rubber-stamp process, with no safegaurds, no verifications, no accountability. And despite recent propositions placed on the state ballot, the laws as passed still do not address the underlying problem of the proper use of Eminent Domain.
Back to the discussion.
TransCanada has been trying to use the "shortest-route" argument as the entire basis for its environmental assessments of the pipeline's impact. It is a faulty-logic argument, in that it treats all "disturbances" the same. That is, that the short-term environmental "disturbance" of construction is of equal to the long-term consequences of a spill.
And given TransCanada's poor track record for the already completed sections of the pipeline - 35 reportable spills/leaks in the first year of operation - it does not bode well for a pipeline of even longer length transiting the central U.S.
The "shortest-route" argument is the reason why there was such objection by Nebraska landowners.
And now that other landowners have seen this, they too chose to fight-back.
Do realize, there has already been one landowner that HAS been successful in preventing the Keystone XL pipeline from crossing her property.
|
Martinman

Champion Author
Mississippi
Posts:14,739 Points:2,093,830 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 12:18:45 PM
Hey...
only in the United States of Corporate America!
-----
"This land was your land And now its our land We stole from you Your courts ruled we can We trample your forests And foul your waters In this land, we steal your property..."
|
myambro

Champion Author
Sacramento
Posts:3,204 Points:1,053,675 Joined:Mar 2005
|
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 11:55:02 AM
Interesting to read this right after reading how they are going to start building on private property before they go through the legal proceedings. I'm just gonna drive this Prius off the lot because I put in the car loan application...
|
Martinman

Champion Author
Mississippi
Posts:14,739 Points:2,093,830 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 11:21:59 AM
You need to read the article. The EPA is not involved in this issue. This is a State Department issue.
|
mikesr100

Champion Author
Sacramento
Posts:3,898 Points:1,081,710 Joined:Apr 2008
|
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 10:30:00 AM
Build the Pipeline inspite of the the Delays from Obummer's EPA
|
teenitup

Champion Author
Houston
Posts:1,655 Points:250,910 Joined:Sep 2012
|
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 9:24:52 AM
Things are shaping up well for the pipeline.
|
BEGTWO

Champion Author
Maryland
Posts:1,947 Points:725,115 Joined:Sep 2010
|
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 8:57:11 AM
Alright Now
|
berniMI

Champion Author
Flint
Posts:7,688 Points:1,107,055 Joined:Oct 2009
|
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 8:36:00 AM
Thank you Martinman below - - - - - you have spoken for many ! ! ! ! ! ! !
|
teenitup

Champion Author
Houston
Posts:1,655 Points:250,910 Joined:Sep 2012
|
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 8:32:38 AM
<<" The facts are widely available, neither country will see a drop of the refined tar sands. We will only see another yacht in the water for the brothers.">>
Where are these facts available?
|
Martinman

Champion Author
Mississippi
Posts:14,739 Points:2,093,830 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 8:00:28 AM
Dodge_Me from atlanta posted...
"Wonder how many other peoples land will be stolen "
-----
All of them.
Unless there is a Supreme Court ruling equivalent to "Kelo v. the City of New London" - in favor of the landowners.
In Texas alone, 850+ landowners are affected by the short segment of pipeline passing through eastern Texas - which is not much wider (north-to-south) than the Texas panhandle.
The last time I checked, there were roughly 100 landowners per state (NE, KS, OK, TX) opposing TransCanada's Eminent Domain efforts, with smaller numbers opposing from the Dakotas.
|
jrs4125

Champion Author
Indiana
Posts:2,763 Points:592,720 Joined:Sep 2011
|
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 6:13:32 AM
Money will win out as it always does.
|
jrsva

Champion Author
Virginia
Posts:9,857 Points:1,613,225 Joined:Jan 2006
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 11:41:25 PM
“There are already many pipelines that are operating successfully, I don't know why this one would be any different.”
Mostly because of what would be in it — a highly corrosive, low net energy product that is mined (not drilled) at great expense and with huge environmental problems that Canada seems disinterested in addressing. We do not need it.
|
Dodge_Me

Champion Author
Atlanta
Posts:2,214 Points:556,980 Joined:Mar 2006
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 11:34:29 PM
Wonder how many other peoples land will be stolen
|
jrsva

Champion Author
Virginia
Posts:9,857 Points:1,613,225 Joined:Jan 2006
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 11:32:39 PM
Alberta’s tar-sands oil is one of the dirtiest sources of energy and also has a very low net energy content. Mining it is creating an environmental disaster in the Canadian sub-arctic; it would be good if the Canadians woke up to what these tar-sands projects are doing to their country. And in a perverse effect, the XL pipeline would be likely to cause midwestern gas prices to increase. Building the southern leg may help reduce the oil bottleneck at Cushing but north of Cushing the rest of it will just import junk oil we do not need.
|
PrinceLH

Champion Author
Ontario
Posts:2,697 Points:539,020 Joined:Jun 2011
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 11:29:08 PM
Lets go Romney!
|
dancygreen

Champion Author
Twin Cities
Posts:2,063 Points:485,760 Joined:Sep 2011
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 11:25:52 PM
ok
|
gaspumpin

Champion Author
Indiana
Posts:1,670 Points:389,355 Joined:Apr 2012
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 11:12:31 PM
Get out of the way Obama.
|
rahcat

Champion Author
Grand Rapids
Posts:2,473 Points:663,925 Joined:Jan 2010
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 11:11:44 PM
Probably will be tied up in court shortly.
|
_Sparty_

Champion Author
Chicago
Posts:2,016 Points:691,565 Joined:Mar 2011
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 11:07:10 PM
No wonder Koch brainwashing works so well. I can't believe how elated people are to stuff more money in to the brothers pockets, while they put Canada's and the United States natural resources at risk. How can everyone think this is going to benefit both countries in some way? The facts are widely available, neither country will see a drop of the refined tar sands. We will only see another yacht in the water for the brothers.
|
Bud122CA

Champion Author
California
Posts:7,476 Points:1,607,050 Joined:Jul 2008
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 11:01:06 PM
To bad they have to use the gov't take over policy
|
drewsworld

Sophomore Author
Los Angeles
Posts:240 Points:19,205 Joined:Aug 2012
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 11:00:28 PM
cool
|
suzmar

Champion Author
Texas
Posts:2,212 Points:872,740 Joined:Jun 2006
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 11:00:25 PM
There are already many pipelines that are operating successfully, I don't know why this one would be any different.
|
frostyWV

Champion Author
West Virginia
Posts:2,339 Points:519,235 Joined:May 2011
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:57:15 PM
about time.
|
OGW

Champion Author
London
Posts:5,329 Points:1,532,975 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:46:14 PM
Texas is stillout of touch with the world.
|
abcdMA

Champion Author
Worcester
Posts:7,927 Points:1,575,955 Joined:Nov 2008
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:45:08 PM
build Keystone
|
kcboy

Champion Author
Utah
Posts:3,973 Points:1,508,775 Joined:Jun 2005
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:44:34 PM
ok
|
ty58

Veteran Author
Akron
Posts:320 Points:485,280 Joined:Jun 2011
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:43:08 PM
lets see where the money re-investment goes
|
rasprout

Champion Author
Tacoma
Posts:3,367 Points:1,222,535 Joined:Jun 2009
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:42:59 PM
Interesting
|
zantor

Veteran Author
San Bernardino
Posts:258 Points:53,025 Joined:Jul 2012
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:40:22 PM
this may not be eminent domain because the end product will be sold overseas
|
DriverofRed

Champion Author
Calgary
Posts:2,178 Points:412,860 Joined:Dec 2011
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:39:44 PM
k
|
bonzoonfmb

Champion Author
Florida
Posts:1,787 Points:645,560 Joined:Feb 2010
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:39:35 PM
Eminent domain should not be used.
|
defiancegasman

Champion Author
Ohio
Posts:7,080 Points:1,323,260 Joined:May 2006
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:39:21 PM
After KEYSTONE STEALS the LAND to run the pipeline, sets up HUGE FUTURE ECOLOGICAL DISASTERS in case of spills, they will use the pipeline to EXPORT THE OIL TO CHINA, not use it in the USA!!
|
Holly123

Champion Author
Charlotte
Posts:3,205 Points:791,145 Joined:Dec 2010
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:39:13 PM
Lol Chas58!!!!
|
Double_Golden

Champion Author
San Francisco
Posts:2,565 Points:606,360 Joined:Aug 2011
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:35:40 PM
I am still not a fan of the Keystone XL...
|
Chas58

All-Star Author
Detroit
Posts:969 Points:285,415 Joined:Mar 2011
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:34:18 PM
They get the pipe and we get the shaft.
|
DeeLA

Champion Author
Los Angeles
Posts:4,818 Points:1,365,330 Joined:Nov 2008
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:34:17 PM
I hope they can get it underway before long.
|
gd83goldwinger

Champion Author
South Bend
Posts:1,428 Points:504,980 Joined:May 2011
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:32:09 PM
I'm just waiting for the but. And how it's going to benefit us.
|
mstearno

Champion Author
Dayton
Posts:8,071 Points:1,732,210 Joined:Jan 2008
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:30:07 PM
I'm tired of people who whine..... how will it raise prices?? why not buy their oil and tell the middle east to stick it?
|
wayoung56

Champion Author
Alabama
Posts:2,805 Points:819,310 Joined:Oct 2006
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:29:59 PM
Hmmmmmmm...
|
tspaldi

Champion Author
Provo
Posts:6,030 Points:937,440 Joined:Sep 2010
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:28:00 PM
Keystone XL = Higher Price at the pump! All this does is allow Canada to deliver their oil to port where it can be sold on the world market. Right now the oil is land locked and has a lower price. Just watch... This will lead to environmental issues in the USA and higher profits for Canada!
|
radiorumor

Champion Author
Texas
Posts:2,817 Points:754,835 Joined:Feb 2011
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:26:50 PM
We’ve had a few arrested were they are staging to lay the pipeline. They’ve been handcuffing themselves to equipment.
|
drz614

Champion Author
Harrisburg
Posts:2,304 Points:598,595 Joined:Aug 2011
|
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:25:39 PM
i m all for bringing crude here safely, but this is worrisome.
|