Not Logged In Log In   Sign Up   Points Leaders
Follow Us    2:31 AM

GasBuddy News Article

52
votes
Keystone XL breaks ground in Texas

The Washington Post -- Early last year, TransCanada started the Keystone pipeline with little fuss or fanfare. It runs from Canada to Steele City, Neb., then east to Wood River and Patoka, Ill. And it got the required permits from the State Department and other agencies.

The company’s next pipeline, the Keystone XL, followed a different route on the ground — and in the political arena, kicking up controversy.

Why didn’t TransCanada use the same route as for the Keystone line?

The first pipeline entered the United States farther to the east and ran down the eastern edge of Nebraska, farther from the state’s ecologically sensitive Sandhills and Ogallala Aquifer.

For Keystone XL, he said, TransCanada looked for a more direct path.

TransCanada spokesman Shawn Howard explains the first Keystone line


Read the Full Article

Submitted Sep 25, 2012 By: Martinman
Category: Daily News Article Discussions > Topics Add to favorite topics  
Author Topic: Keystone XL breaks ground in Texas Back to Topics
REPLIES (newest first) Post a Reply
Profile Pic
honda0105
Champion Author Tallahassee

Posts:22,479
Points:2,117,665
Joined:Nov 2008
Message Posted: Sep 30, 2012 11:00:08 PM

hope it will not be taken by force.
Profile Pic
teenitup
Champion Author Houston

Posts:4,417
Points:734,135
Joined:Sep 2012
Message Posted: Sep 30, 2012 10:40:43 AM

It was posted that Holland of Texas Rice Land Partners was offered almost half a million dollars for the easement! He rejected it.

Profile Pic
honda0105
Champion Author Tallahassee

Posts:22,479
Points:2,117,665
Joined:Nov 2008
Message Posted: Sep 30, 2012 7:40:16 AM

agree w/ LEC and Mm.

Profile Pic
LetemEatCake
Champion Author Oklahoma City

Posts:5,705
Points:1,360,915
Joined:Mar 2008
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 10:24:28 PM


Agree with Martins's several comments! Unfortunately it is almost a done deal in TX because of there Railroad Commissions past actions.

I can only hope that in OK with the many sovereign Indian land, that this pipeline will become a non-issue! As in NO pipeline!
Profile Pic
teenitup
Champion Author Houston

Posts:4,417
Points:734,135
Joined:Sep 2012
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 2:23:22 PM

The Texas Property Code addresses Eminent Domain at great length as well, hardly a rubber stamp.

Texas Property Code
Profile Pic
teenitup
Champion Author Houston

Posts:4,417
Points:734,135
Joined:Sep 2012
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 2:19:59 PM

Lots of semantics being tossed around here.

The article is correct in reference to the Keystone XL reference.

From wiki " It consists of the operational "Keystone Pipeline" and "Keystone-Cushing Extension", and two proposed pipeline expansion segments, referred to as Keystone XL Pipeline and the Gulf Coast Project. After the Keystone XL pipeline segments are completed, American crude oil would enter the XL pipelines at Baker, Montana and Cushing, Oklahoma.[1]"

And according to the 1975 EPCA act since the XL segment from Hardisty to Baker Wyoming to Steele City Nebraska (separate drone the original Keystone from Hardisty to Steele City) will carry US Bakken crude, thus commingled with Canadian crude, the oil cannot be exported unless the President deems export is in the national interest (very rarely has this ever happened).
Profile Pic
Martinman
Champion Author Mississippi

Posts:17,046
Points:2,592,240
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 12:44:32 PM

Also realize that the above article, as written, is partially incorrect.

Those portions of the recently completed pipeline on the U.S. side of the border, *are* part of the Keystone XL pipeline project.

- Phase I involved the construction from the existing natural gas pipeline in Canada, to the Wood River refinery and Patoka storage facility extension - both in Illinois. (completed June 2010)

- Phase II involved construction of the Steele City Nebraska to Cushing Oklahoma section - both of which lay east of the Ogallala Aquifer. (completed February 2011)

- Phase III involves the current Cushing Oklahoma, to Nederland Texas, segment that is in dispute.

- Phase IV invovles the Canada to Steel City Nebraska routing that was stopped before any construction began.
Profile Pic
sparky808
Champion Author Honolulu

Posts:5,142
Points:1,085,825
Joined:Sep 2011
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 12:33:25 PM

Thank you for posting.
Profile Pic
Martinman
Champion Author Mississippi

Posts:17,046
Points:2,592,240
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 12:31:06 PM

That is how the Texas state Code is written.

It is little more than a rubber-stamp process, with no safegaurds, no verifications, no accountability. And despite recent propositions placed on the state ballot, the laws as passed still do not address the underlying problem of the proper use of Eminent Domain.

Back to the discussion.

TransCanada has been trying to use the "shortest-route" argument as the entire basis for its environmental assessments of the pipeline's impact. It is a faulty-logic argument, in that it treats all "disturbances" the same. That is, that the short-term environmental "disturbance" of construction is of equal to the long-term consequences of a spill.

And given TransCanada's poor track record for the already completed sections of the pipeline - 35 reportable spills/leaks in the first year of operation - it does not bode well for a pipeline of even longer length transiting the central U.S.

The "shortest-route" argument is the reason why there was such objection by Nebraska landowners.

And now that other landowners have seen this, they too chose to fight-back.

Do realize, there has already been one landowner that HAS been successful in preventing the Keystone XL pipeline from crossing her property.
Profile Pic
Martinman
Champion Author Mississippi

Posts:17,046
Points:2,592,240
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 12:18:45 PM

Hey...

only in the United States of Corporate America!

-----

"This land was your land
And now its our land
We stole from you
Your courts ruled we can
We trample your forests
And foul your waters
In this land, we steal your property..."
Profile Pic
myambro
Champion Author Sacramento

Posts:4,303
Points:1,492,850
Joined:Mar 2005
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 11:55:02 AM

Interesting to read this right after reading how they are going to start building on private property before they go through the legal proceedings.
I'm just gonna drive this Prius off the lot because I put in the car loan application...
Profile Pic
Martinman
Champion Author Mississippi

Posts:17,046
Points:2,592,240
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 11:21:59 AM

You need to read the article. The EPA is not involved in this issue. This is a State Department issue.
Profile Pic
mikesr100
Champion Author Sacramento

Posts:6,238
Points:1,588,515
Joined:Apr 2008
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 10:30:00 AM

Build the Pipeline inspite of the the Delays from Obummer's EPA
Profile Pic
teenitup
Champion Author Houston

Posts:4,417
Points:734,135
Joined:Sep 2012
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 9:24:52 AM

Things are shaping up well for the pipeline.
Profile Pic
BEGTWO
Champion Author Maryland

Posts:3,926
Points:1,196,555
Joined:Sep 2010
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 8:57:11 AM

Alright Now
Profile Pic
berniMI
Champion Author Flint

Posts:11,319
Points:1,606,430
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 8:36:00 AM

Thank you Martinman below - - - - - you have spoken for many ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Profile Pic
teenitup
Champion Author Houston

Posts:4,417
Points:734,135
Joined:Sep 2012
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 8:32:38 AM

<<" The facts are widely available, neither country will see a drop of the refined tar sands. We will only see another yacht in the water for the brothers.">>

Where are these facts available?

Profile Pic
Martinman
Champion Author Mississippi

Posts:17,046
Points:2,592,240
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 8:00:28 AM

Dodge_Me from atlanta posted...

"Wonder how many other peoples land will be stolen "

-----

All of them.

Unless there is a Supreme Court ruling equivalent to "Kelo v. the City of New London" - in favor of the landowners.

In Texas alone, 850+ landowners are affected by the short segment of pipeline passing through eastern Texas - which is not much wider (north-to-south) than the Texas panhandle.

The last time I checked, there were roughly 100 landowners per state (NE, KS, OK, TX) opposing TransCanada's Eminent Domain efforts, with smaller numbers opposing from the Dakotas.
Profile Pic
jrs4125
Champion Author Indiana

Posts:4,765
Points:1,090,305
Joined:Sep 2011
Message Posted: Sep 26, 2012 6:13:32 AM

Money will win out as it always does.
Profile Pic
jrsva
Champion Author Virginia

Posts:12,396
Points:2,123,025
Joined:Jan 2006
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 11:41:25 PM

“There are already many pipelines that are operating successfully, I don't know why this one would be any different.”

Mostly because of what would be in it — a highly corrosive, low net energy product that is mined (not drilled) at great expense and with huge environmental problems that Canada seems disinterested in addressing. We do not need it.

Profile Pic
Dodge_Me
Champion Author Atlanta

Posts:2,222
Points:940,940
Joined:Mar 2006
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 11:34:29 PM

Wonder how many other peoples land will be stolen
Profile Pic
jrsva
Champion Author Virginia

Posts:12,396
Points:2,123,025
Joined:Jan 2006
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 11:32:39 PM

Alberta’s tar-sands oil is one of the dirtiest sources of energy and also has a very low net energy content. Mining it is creating an environmental disaster in the Canadian sub-arctic; it would be good if the Canadians woke up to what these tar-sands projects are doing to their country. And in a perverse effect, the XL pipeline would be likely to cause midwestern gas prices to increase. Building the southern leg may help reduce the oil bottleneck at Cushing but north of Cushing the rest of it will just import junk oil we do not need.

Profile Pic
PrinceLH
Champion Author Ontario

Posts:5,037
Points:1,045,845
Joined:Jun 2011
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 11:29:08 PM

Lets go Romney!
Profile Pic
dancygreen
Champion Author Twin Cities

Posts:3,132
Points:723,760
Joined:Sep 2011
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 11:25:52 PM

ok
Profile Pic
gaspumpin
Champion Author Indiana

Posts:3,675
Points:887,825
Joined:Apr 2012
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 11:12:31 PM

Get out of the way Obama.
Profile Pic
rahcat
Champion Author Grand Rapids

Posts:5,035
Points:1,170,975
Joined:Jan 2010
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 11:11:44 PM

Probably will be tied up in court shortly.
Profile Pic
_Sparty_
Champion Author Chicago

Posts:4,334
Points:1,197,765
Joined:Mar 2011
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 11:07:10 PM

No wonder Koch brainwashing works so well. I can't believe how elated people are to stuff more money in to the brothers pockets, while they put Canada's and the United States natural resources at risk. How can everyone think this is going to benefit both countries in some way? The facts are widely available, neither country will see a drop of the refined tar sands. We will only see another yacht in the water for the brothers.
Profile Pic
Bud122CA
Champion Author California

Posts:9,330
Points:2,082,895
Joined:Jul 2008
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 11:01:06 PM

To bad they have to use the gov't take over policy
Profile Pic
drewsworld
Sophomore Author Los Angeles

Posts:246
Points:24,900
Joined:Aug 2012
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 11:00:28 PM

cool
Profile Pic
suzmar
Champion Author Texas

Posts:3,497
Points:1,326,515
Joined:Jun 2006
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 11:00:25 PM

There are already many pipelines that are operating successfully, I don't know why this one would be any different.
Profile Pic
frostyWV
Champion Author West Virginia

Posts:2,340
Points:521,130
Joined:May 2011
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:57:15 PM

about time.
Profile Pic
OGW
Champion Author London

Posts:6,863
Points:1,967,515
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:46:14 PM

Texas is stillout of touch with the world.
Profile Pic
abcdMA
Champion Author Worcester

Posts:10,217
Points:2,073,665
Joined:Nov 2008
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:45:08 PM

build Keystone
Profile Pic
kcboy
Champion Author Utah

Posts:5,711
Points:1,894,820
Joined:Jun 2005
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:44:34 PM

ok
Profile Pic
ty58
Veteran Author Akron

Posts:432
Points:875,965
Joined:Jun 2011
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:43:08 PM

lets see where the money re-investment goes
Profile Pic
rasprout
Champion Author Tacoma

Posts:3,370
Points:1,544,895
Joined:Jun 2009
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:42:59 PM

Interesting
Profile Pic
zantor
Veteran Author San Bernardino

Posts:258
Points:53,025
Joined:Jul 2012
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:40:22 PM

this may not be eminent domain because the end product will be sold overseas
Profile Pic
DriverofRed
Champion Author Calgary

Posts:4,231
Points:822,405
Joined:Dec 2011
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:39:44 PM

k
Profile Pic
bonzoonfmb
Champion Author Florida

Posts:2,540
Points:888,110
Joined:Feb 2010
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:39:35 PM

Eminent domain should not be used.
Profile Pic
defiancegasman
Champion Author Ohio

Posts:7,188
Points:1,355,355
Joined:May 2006
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:39:21 PM

After KEYSTONE STEALS the LAND to run the pipeline, sets up HUGE FUTURE ECOLOGICAL DISASTERS in case of spills, they will use the pipeline to EXPORT THE OIL TO CHINA, not use it in the USA!!
Profile Pic
Holly123
Champion Author Charlotte

Posts:5,241
Points:1,281,055
Joined:Dec 2010
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:39:13 PM

Lol Chas58!!!!
Profile Pic
Double_Golden
Champion Author San Francisco

Posts:4,085
Points:1,004,660
Joined:Aug 2011
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:35:40 PM

I am still not a fan of the Keystone XL...
Profile Pic
Chas58
Champion Author Detroit

Posts:3,186
Points:767,030
Joined:Mar 2011
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:34:18 PM

They get the pipe and we get the shaft.
Profile Pic
DeeLA
Champion Author Los Angeles

Posts:7,056
Points:1,861,135
Joined:Nov 2008
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:34:17 PM

I hope they can get it underway before long.
Profile Pic
gd83goldwinger
Champion Author South Bend

Posts:2,584
Points:794,580
Joined:May 2011
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:32:09 PM

I'm just waiting for the but. And how it's going to benefit us.
Profile Pic
mstearno
Champion Author Dayton

Posts:9,433
Points:2,152,110
Joined:Jan 2008
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:30:07 PM

I'm tired of people who whine.....
how will it raise prices??
why not buy their oil and tell the middle east to stick it?
Profile Pic
wayoung56
Champion Author Alabama

Posts:5,015
Points:1,312,110
Joined:Oct 2006
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:29:59 PM

Hmmmmmmm...
Profile Pic
tspaldi
Champion Author Provo

Posts:8,287
Points:1,438,950
Joined:Sep 2010
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:28:00 PM

Keystone XL = Higher Price at the pump! All this does is allow Canada to deliver their oil to port where it can be sold on the world market. Right now the oil is land locked and has a lower price. Just watch... This will lead to environmental issues in the USA and higher profits for Canada!
Profile Pic
radiorumor
Champion Author Texas

Posts:5,055
Points:1,259,050
Joined:Feb 2011
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:26:50 PM

We’ve had a few arrested were they are staging to lay the pipeline. They’ve been handcuffing themselves to equipment.
Profile Pic
drz614
Champion Author Harrisburg

Posts:4,649
Points:1,106,090
Joined:Aug 2011
Message Posted: Sep 25, 2012 10:25:39 PM

i m all for bringing crude here safely, but this is worrisome.
Post a reply Back to Topics